Feeds, issues, packages and code source about emulation and pograming, of VENENUX proyects, Debian related distros and massenkoh!

Why gitlab, SourceForge instead GitHub? SF vs GL vs GH!


Why SourceForge instead of GitHub?

The answer is actually quite simple, the only reason, GitHub doesn't offer dinamic php+mysql web hosting, neither a place to upload packages (just a master package) and then provide statistics on those files. SourceForge does provide that feature and even breaks it down on a daily, weekly, monthly, annually, and all time statistics. Of course, too complex, heavy and get many workload on client side on browsers, but provide it and with a lot of space!!!.

Why GitHub instead SourceForge?

A poor but easy reason, EASY TO USE! GITHUB ITS SIMPLE AND FASTER, a guindoser like reason of course: easy to use and lightweight interface, not much usefully but great for little projects.
Github its extremely easy to use, easy to understand, easy to navigate, no complications and the web interface load MUCH MORE FASTER rather than SF! so for any quick and fast develop, github or gitlab make the deal!


For mayor projects that need heavywheith features with stitcs and great control: SF, 
For little and short time things, Github for novices.
time statistics. Of course, too complex, heavy and get many workload on client side on browsers, but provide it and with a lot of space!!!.


Gitlab its the github with steroids! have easy to use level, easy to understand interface, easy to navigate, and have almost all the sourceforge features that gitlab does not!

  • organize with real project hierarqui, github does not and sourceforge not provides
  • easy issue interface with simple way to manange
  • permits private projects, gitlab dont neither sourceforge!
  • the only problem, the gitlab web hosting its a pain!


Sourceforge provides webhosting with php, mysql and cgi support, event github/gitlab static pages!!!!.

debian jessie

Debian jessie are now stable an i now back to squeeze, with etch, lenny are now freeze for me, so then, working now in finish sysvinit/hal era of linux and started the new systemd/udev era
Ian was gone! and new stuffs comes to Debian, many caused breaks, like the rumors of fork of it! Ian Murdok the father of Debian project always thing about proyections but today that its a M$ like enterprice!


With this release, hal and sysvinit has end, the "hard-forced" systemd from win-hat guys are a fact and udev/upower/udisk are the new devices managers.

The wheeze release was only a "transitional release" like sarge does and lenny/etch does!

The UEFI support was added but not as totally free software. UEFI uses a firmware check so has a closed object check at boot. The boot areenabled in 32 and 64 bits archs.

Multiarch is a radical rethinking of the filesystem hierarchy with respect to library and header paths, to make programs and libraries of different hardware architectures easily installable in parallel on the very same system. So with this i386 and x64 can be both packages instalable in same machine. Of couse be prepared to a lot of space consume, its like have a duplication of.

Media installers reduced: yes now all come to the net, only a set of 4 DVD's or 12 CD's are made, the rest of sofware are in the repositories.

Mate, cinnamon are new desktop, in the old-school fashion scene, and now backport are in main as normal repository!


Personally now the linux scenary are like the M$ does, a windo-like systems with huge of complex requeriments and user-oriented stupid things. Minimun requeriments are raised now from 200MHz with 128Ram for a GTK/qt desktop to a minimun of 1GHz with 1GB Ram for decent web browsing!

U are forced to use those if comes for frowsing and use recent hardware and recent stuff need this recent release of jessie! There's no way, other than VenenuX 0.X series or the recent Debian/VenenuX releases.